i have the same than SokarGoldberg:

2014-12-07T19:16:39.355+01:00 |cff0000Lua Error: bad argument #1 to 'pairs' (table/struct expected, got function)
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'pairs'
user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/ddShopkeeper.lua:658: in function 'SKScrollList:FilterScrollList'
EsoUI/Libraries/ZO_SortFilterList/ZO_SortFilterList.lua:122: in function 'ZO_SortFilterList:RefreshData'
user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/ddShopkeeper.lua:604: in function 'SKScrollList:Initialize'
user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/ddShopkeeper.lua:609: in function 'SKScrollList:New'
user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/ddShopkeeper.lua:1078: in function 'ddSK:SetupShopkeeperWindow'
user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/ddShopkeeper.lua:1964: in function 'ddSK:Initialize'
user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/ddShopkeeper.lua:2083: in function 'ddSK.OnAddOnLoaded'|r

Nope, I would know. If I ever don't set it, I start getting memory errors from Combat Analytics when I am doing trials. Combat Analytics shows that it is currently set at 400.

ok just trying to be helpful

btw 400 meg is not a clean selection

go to 256 or 512 unless you are running on an OS I am unaware :-)

You ever notice you can't buy a 400 meg chip?

if you call for 400 meg your going to get 512 and waste the rest.

I had no idea Combat Stats did this:


as does my program:


-d

I don't want to offend mod author, but it works worse with every update. The last two updates is the worst. I really like it and it's good that mod don't crash now, but it need a lot of work. As for now, I deleted all my data and tried to scan, but it took less than a min and not all sales. I'm in 3 big trade guild (EU) and 2 of them have trader in Rawl'kha, so the sales history should be extremly large, but now it almost empty.

Yup, that does make sense. I adjusted it to 256 and received no errors during our Sanctum Ophidia run tonight.

I'm getting that error after the update. Is this addon supposed to be working with data daedra at the same time?

The documentation in the front page is not entirely clear about it. As there is this other one here that also claims to work with data daedra. Not sure which one to use.

Any in depth explanation is welcome.

The last few versions of this addon breaks the Guild History tab of the Guild window. Is there perhaps an issue where this addon is trying to begin searching before the Guild History element is fully loaded into the UI, and thus delaying the Guild History element from loading into the UI?

When this addon is disabled, the Guild History is immediately available. As soon as I turn the addon back on and /reloadui, the Guild History is again broken (open the guild window and the history tab is just gone), and the addon just spins and spins trying to get the sales history.

next error:

This is getting annoying...

Give the author a break, he has taken a massive leap in updating Shopkeeper, the code was a mess if you had taken the time to look at it... Not only that, he is publishing relatively quick updates to errors posted.

He also has other addons which he has to balance maintenance on, plus is also attempting to bring this addon into a format of coding where he can integrate two addons which the api of eso does not like at all.

Deome, kudos and hats off to you for maintaining this addon.

Here, Here!
I knew the former author of the mod and he had taken it over from someone else.
So I can only imagine the code was a mess.

I am still getting errors, but these things happen from time to time.

Thank you so much Deome for taking on the daunting task of another mod.

^ This.

you can just try GSA for trade history, and updated Price Tracker for tooltips
http://www.esoui.com/downloads/info8...raconeran.html

always updated, and all errors shortly adressed and fixed, with large group of testers
and authors are very friendly for bugreports and suggestions

Really?

1) It was written REALLY well (the original Shopkeeper)
2) Don't take over a mod you can't support
3) I had my version of Shopkeeper fixed in 2 day.

These "Bugs" are all based on a Lib he is creating thus creating his own problems and maybe this should be in beta.

I don't know how many times myself and Garkin have been here giving out code, advice to help people.

I'm all for cutting someone a break, and I like Deome a lot, but these are errors he caused.

See this:

"user:/AddOns/ddShopkeeper/Libs/LibGuildHistory/LibGuildHistory.lua:67: in function 'RequestPage'"

that Lib is NOT in the original Shopkeeper -- the scanning was just fine
you are now on months 3(?) while he works out the bugs in LibGuildHistory

This is your CLASSIC case of don't fix what's NOT BROKEN.

I have a version of Shopkeeper as part of my mod.

ZERO error reports - not one - ever - for the entire package of software.

An author shouldn't just slap some code in, upload it and let everyone else beta test it.

A continuation of Shopkeeper WOULD NOT contain LibGuildHistory.

I have tons of respect for Deome and this is not a rant against him personally but it is a critique of what he is doing here. Frustrating users is not truly continuing an addon.

Put up a working stable one then release a BETA for those that want to try your new features and Lib's.

If anything he's tarnishing the image of Shopkeeper, which was anything but "poorly written"!

-d

Edit: In re-reading this I don't want to come off too harsh on Deome. I just feel bad for all the users who just want to get on with playing and not fighting with an addon. That being said Deome has told me personally he only comes to ESOUI once a week and hardly reads his comments section so you are almost screaming into the wind. It makes me wonder why he took this on and why he made such BIG changes that were not necessary.

Does everyone remember the original problem with Shopkeeper? If you can find an untouched version of 1.0 and go into options and turn off "tool tips" the program worked perfect. Honest, that's it. You would also have to update the manifest. If someone wants me to do that as a one off thing - remove the bad tool tip code and make the manifest current I will and all this will be done.

Personally I like Tony's suggestion - but I'm probably biased.

I don't get the point of continuously offering alternatives that don't begin to replace the functionality of what you are offering an alternative to. Over the past like 6 pages I see something like 4 or 5 attempts to get people to use GSA. Who goes into another addon author's comment thread and continuously pushes their own addon? Sure, Price Tracker and DSA have great uses, but neither can replace Datadaedra or Shopkeeper. Honestly, your suggestions are like suggesting an extremely well-crafted bicycle to a man that is having car trouble.

I agree with the poster below suggesting that everyone give Deome a break. He is the only person attempting to maintain shopkeeper without stripping half off the functionality out of it. If you guys run him off, then those of us that want a maintained Shopkeeper that actually keeps tracking ALL SALES and DataDaedra tool tips that provide sale data about all sales are going to be SOL.

Just so we are clear - I wrote GSA and NEVER once mention it as a alternative (I looked back that statement is incorrect). I stand corrected I did mention it as an alternative in this forum.

I only come here to help - even offering (if you read my post) to do this:

Personally I don't care what you use, not you specifically but anyone. Whatever makes the game more fun for you.

GSA is no ego trip for me - if no one uses it I wouldn't care. Please don't start a Shopkeeper vs GSA bla bla bla .... you and I have had many conversations in here and I might have mentioned my addon but I do not come here to advertise. I'll be going back and editing all my post to remove the links. I enjoy helping people, that's why I come here.

I was giving some background on why you don't see posts here from Deome and some insight on the new errors. Because, they should not be attributed to the original Shopkeeper as the scanning guilds routine has been completely changed.

I have personally emailed Deome fixes, and posted them here.

But, I have empathy too. I'm sure people just want to get on with playing and not having an addon work really bums you out.

My offer still stands. I will take and fix the original Shopkeeper 1.0 (minus the bad tool tip code) as a ONE time thing and upload it. Call it Shopkeeper Classic

My main point was this forum is filled with bug reports and not "continuously offering alternatives that don't begin to replace the functionality of what you are offering an alternative to"

The majority of posts are errors and I wanted to make it clear I am not here promoting my addon, only to help. I can't control other people. This reads like you are blaming me:

Please clarify -- I am not here doing that - do I mention it sometimes, yes. Did I also help you clear up a memory issue, yes. I think I also mentioned the non-gui version I have so you CAN STAY with this addon, which I clearly don't understand why that's bad.

No one is not giving Deome a break but if you look at it from the other side is it fair to "take it over" and introduce bugs and not address them?

I think this program should be renamed to something else as the core code of it has change and the name should reflect that.

I have no beef with Deome and as I have said many times I like him. I was coming here to assist because I know from talking to him that he doesn't come here.

I will no longer stop by and assist.

I don't care what addons people use and I hope this one eventually gets to the point where it's bug free.

best of luck,

-d